Read Chris Benoit’s Unconscionable Boilerplate Booking Contract, WWE Lawsuit Challenged These Types of Deals

The WWE lawsuit directly confronted the WWE’s use of illegal contracts.

In part the lawsuit alleged: “The Booking Contracts, the “Contractor Nostalgia Agreement”, the “handshake deals” are outrageous, were procured by fraud, coercion and unequal bargaining power, and violate public policy and the statutes which are set forth in this Complaint, as well as references to applicable law. For those reasons and applicable law, here repeated and realleged in every detail, the Booking Contracts should be set aside and declared null and void, as having been procured and necessary through fraud, coercion, intimidation, while a progressive disease process intentionally hidden from the Plaintiffs was allowed to proceed and the WWE to rob the Plaintiffs of any ability to comprehend their circumstances.”

See Chris Benoit’s Unconscionable Contract that forced wrestlers to release WWE from all liability even to their own Deaths.

“Wrestler hereby releases, waives and discharges promoter from all liability to wrestler and covenants not to sue promoter for any and all loss or damage on account of injury to their person or property or resulting in serious or permanent injury to wrestler or in wrestler’s death, whether caused by negligence of promoter or other wrestler under contract to promoter.”

SEE the WWE Lawsuit section on this important issue >>>>

See Non-frivolous Nature of this Claim as demonstrated by Law Review and Academic Articles:

1) Employees vs. Independent Contractors and Professional Wrestling: How the WWE Is Taking a Folding-Chair to the Basic Tenents of Employment Law By David Cowley September 2014 University of Louisville Law Review;Fall2014, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p143

WWE Hits Kyros With $357,000 Bill & WWE Lawyer Jerry McDevitt Reveals He is Avid Reader of This Blog!!

Today WWE Defense counsel Mr. Jerry McDevitt sent Mr. Kyros a bill ( an application to the Court to award this amount) for a portion WWE’s legal fees totaling a cool $357,000+ and change, along with a document that attempts to describe the contents of this very important blog, and criticizes Kyros’ comments to the press, see the WWE economic attack on Kyros here: K&L Gates Bill 1, Day Pitney Bill-2 and Accusations about this blog and fee request here.

Kyros Law Offices Official Statement on this latest WWE activity:

“In seeking over $357,000 for my advocacy on behalf of professional wrestlers, the WWE deploys economic warfare as a tactic to silence anyone who dares to speak for them, fight for their rights and be a voice for CTE awareness in professional wrestlers. I will continue to stand for the rights of professional wrestlers injured and exploited by WWE’s outrageous misconduct. The case is about them, their rights, their plight and not about me as their voice and advocate.

With respect to the Court’s ruling, I have strongly voiced my disagreement on behalf of my clients. I express my opinion that the Court in its ruling dismissing the claims of these women and men ignored the wrestlers’ legal rights to a safe workplace. The Court ignored the wrestlers’ rights to be treated under the law as employees. The Court ignored the claims of families of some of the most famous athletes ever diagnosed with CTE including Mr. Fuji and Jimmy Snuka. The Court ignored the fact that WWE actions and inactions have led to a tragic epidemic of suicides, drug and alcohol addiction, overdoses and total health crisis that has engulfed the wrestling community.

I encourage anyone interested in the plight of the wrestlers to actually read the wrestlers dismissed lawsuit to judge for themselves if it is frivolous or fails to make proper legal and factual arguments about fraudulent nondisclosure, medical monitoring and tolling the SOL. Regarding the Court’s order that the public needs protection from my advocacy, it is my opinion that it is in fact, the professional wrestlers I represent who need protection from WWE’s exploitation and legacy of neglecting their legal duties.

Substantially similar claims have been invoked and pled in the NFL, NHL and NCAA cases, in my opinion a major difference being that the wrestlers’ claims are factually and legally far stronger. The wrestlers under the current ruling have no rights to even the basic protections of labor law. The wrestlers assert facts in their 64 affidavits and pleadings that should bring investigation, legal reform, and Congressional Oversight to the WWE’s illicit practices. The wrestlers want a day in court and Trial by Jury.

I have great respect for the process, and I learned a great deal from the Judge and have endeavored to follow all of the Courts’ rules and Orders. I have even learned from the fanaticism, belligerence and sharp practice of defense counsel Mr. McDevitt, who seems to believe calling me dishonest enough times will make it true. My candid criticism of the ruling against my clients is a voice for the Justice of their cause. As I have stated the wrestlers will Appeal this tragic ruling that ignores their legal rights, voices and hopes. The WWE will be defeated with Truth and Justice.”

Sincerely,
Konstantine Kyros

WWE Wrestlers Lose, NCAA Players Win

Days After 60 WWE Wrestlers Claims Tossed: Two NCAA Players Win in Federal Court With Nearly Identical Claims

On October 1, 2018, a Federal Judge in Illinois ruled in favor of two former college football players with nearly identical allegations to those dismissed by the wrestlers just days before.  The Illinois federal court ruled in favor of two players who have pled at this stage, seemingly weaker claims than the WWE wrestlers. In stark and striking contrast, a Connecticut Judge tossed the wrestlers claims and harshly blamed the advocate for the brain damaged wrestlers for filing frivolous lawsuits brought on nearly identical factual and legal grounds/theories to the successful NCAA players claims.

Continue Reading Story Here

Marty Jannetty. Are His Ankle Injuries Another “Irrelevant Allegation”? See Excerpts of His Affidavit to the Court


Read Marty’s Plea to the Court of his situation made in an Affidavit a year before his case was Broomed

What duty does WWE have to help former wrestlers? The recently dismissed, soon to be appealed lawsuit, argued that WWE actually has legal duties to the injured wrestlers who brought the case. Just as if say, an NFL football player was injured and had long term occupational injuries to their body, the player would, at a minimum would be covered by Workers Comp Laws for their life long injuries. Not so WWE wrestlers. They get: NOTHING, Zero, Zilch. Hence the need to go to the courts to correct this problematic situation.

The WWE according to the lawsuit misclassified it’s wrestlers with unconscionable, unenforceable, boilerplate contracts (you know the kind of one-sided contracts “that aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on”- that’s the kind of contract the wrestlers say WWE uses). The wrestlers argued that these kinds of one-sided contracts violated things called labor laws which are designed to protect people like Marty Jannetty who sustain injuries when they work for a company (particularly injuries with long-term consequences, you know like when you snap your ankle in Madison Square Garden or who you know, just might develop CTE or health issues of that nature and whatnot from numerous untreated concussions).

The Court Ruling doesn’t due much Justice to these claims and even singles out Marty’s ankle injuries as follows: “In addition to these irrelevant allegations  are numerous others, including a list of physical injuries that have nothing to do with concussions or head trauma, incurred by several Plaintiffs in the ring. [See SAC Paragraph 37 alleging that “Plaintiff Jon Heidenreich sustained serious shoulder injuries requiring multiple surgeries” and that ; Plaintiff Marty Jannetty sustained a severe broken ankle”]

The astute reader will also note the addiction issues raised in Marty’s affidavit and how those relate to untreated occupational injuries (including head injuries). An earlier post discussed how addiction issues have been studied by researchers in Public Health who shockingly related that the origin of addiction issues can be from untreated workplace injuries!!  (Anyone reading believe that their could be Any long term injury issues to be studied, identified or treated by WWE as amongst the ranks of professional wrestlers????)

Jimmy Snuka: World’s Most Famous Athlete Diagnosed with CTE? Court Gets it Wrong, CTE PROOF See below. Read Carole Snuka’s Plea to Judge

The lawsuits were brought because of WWE’s Continuing Refusal into 2018 to Admit Wrestlers are at Risk for CTE. The WWE Denies and Now the Court Dismissed the claims. The WWE’s lawyer even called for Mr. Kyros to be Disbarred. Decide for yourself, read on.

Jimmy Superfly Snuka, the world learned in November 2017 was diagnosed with Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) as part of his Estates legal claims against the WWE for failing to protect, treat and help him and other wrestlers suffering from the disease. The donation and CTE study were coordinated by Konstantine Kyros after Jimmy died during the pendency of his lawsuit seeking to get help from the WWE.

The effect of the CTE diagnosis (and that of several others such as Rex King and Mr. Fuji) was not what one would have expected. Instead of the WWE realizing that there was just maybe something to all these wrestlers suing them for help, they simply ignored it. It was as if the diagnosis didn’t happen at all. There were no calls for increased research into wrestlers brain tissue, no donation drives, no calls for outreach to wrestlers with CTE symptoms, no alteration in tone and frequency of the legal attacks on the lawyers bringing the claims for the CTE-riddled wrestlers. It was as if the world’s most famous athlete diagnosed with CTE, Jimmy Superfly Snuka didn’t exist.

Ironically in the months before his death, the state of his brain was of intense interest for more media driven rather than public health reasons.

The debate over Mr. Snuka’s brain in his murder hearings, mirrors that of two competing views of reality in the WWE lawsuits:

A) The position of the Plaintiffs and their lawyers:
CTE is a known occupational disease that is a risk of wrestling which has resulted in a health crisis that requires immediate urgent WWE action in terms of study, medical treatment and compensation.

B) Or what is essentially WWE’s position:
Wrestling a relatively safe activity with an unquantified CTE risk. Wrestling has among its goals not to injure anyone and at present it is not worth a WWE funded, dedicated study of wrestlers brains for CTE. No WWE outreach, warnings, medical treatment are required for former wrestlers.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Shortly before Jimmy’s, death, an expert, a certain John O’Brien testifying to support the prosecutions case to put Superfly on trial for a 1986 murder made the following observations before the presiding Judge: Mr. O’Brien, who examined Snuka in February (2016) and reviewed doctors’ reports on the wrestler, said there is no documented evidence that Snuka sustained even one concussion during his 40-year career in the ring.

But wait there’s more unusual insight from Dr. O’Brien:

The psychiatrist said the assertion that Snuka had suffered numerous concussions during his career came from the wrestler and his wife, not any doctor. O’Brien said he didn’t believe Snuka was ever at risk for serious head injury, despite his high-flying acrobatics in the ring. “It’s theater wrestling. It’s like stage fighting,” O’Brien said. “It’s not the same kind of injury you’d expect to see with heavyweight boxing or professional football.”

(Evocative of Triple H’s 2013 Statements at WWE ‘Donate’ $1.2 Million Dollars to the Nowinski NOT TO STUDY WRESTLERS BRAINS Press Conference? Levesque said pro wrestling is fundamentally different from football when it comes to hard impacts. “If you’re in the NFL, your goal is to try to hit the other guy as hard as possible. … The goal in what we do is the exact opposite,” said Levesque.)

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

LEGAL THEORY of WWE’s LIABILITY:
Yesterday the court ruled against the Snuka family despite his confirmed CTE, Alzheimer’s diagnosis and his long-term ongoing relationship with WWE as one of their greatest stars.

Read Carole Snuka’s Personal Affidavit filed in the Laurinaitis case Tragically IGNORED by the Judge HERE.

The tragic Court ruling reads in part: “The affidavit does not support that Mr. Snuka suffered any head injuries or risked incurring such injuries later than 1996. … And Mr. Snuka has not alleged that any of his alleged injuries were incurred during WWE appearances post-dating 1996…. wrongful death actions are barred… survival actions are barred because the statutes of limitation or repose for each deceased Plaintiff’s other claims have elapsed.”

The court seems to have ruled essentially that in order to bring a claim for CTE- the underlying head injuries that cause CTE would have needed to occur within five years of the date he died. As will be easily demonstrated below this makes no sense.  The problem with this analysis in our view is that it ignores what CTE is:

1) A latent progressive degenerative disease found in athletes with a history of head injuries.
2) CTE is not linked to a single identified blow to the head, but rather from the accumulation of repeated sub-concussive blows.
3) Symptoms of CTE may not occur for many years after the blows to the head occurred.

So in essence the Snuka CTE claim could be said to arise from his exposure to head injuries in WWE, and so a Jury would need to decide what event or events would determine what started the clock ticking on whether his estate could bring a claim under the deadlines imposed by Connecticut Law. The Judge seems to have adopted, on what factual or medical basis is unknown as she does not say directly, an injury-in-fact type event which began this hypothetical clock ticking.

Under the science of CTE progression, the Judge’s ruling would seem to foreclose most legal claims for neurological occupational disease type injuries. For example Asbestos or chemical exposure claims for example could be barred if a worker was exposed 20 years before he or she developed mesothelioma cancer or a rare leukemia. The majority of courts looking at these problems have decided to allow experts and Juries to make this determination absent some clear case law. Connecticut appears to impose a fact type analysis on what constitutes the appropriate date to start the clock. When Snuka retired from wrestling and began to experience symptoms, say 10 years after retirement, perhaps the WWE could argue that that was the appropriate date for the clock to start. Plaintiffs contended that Tau protein being released are continuous present physical injuries that could be used to decide a trigger date. In any event these facts, we argue are medical-legal questions prematurely decided.

Seemingly some ‘experts’ were fighting out in the year before Mr. Snuka died whether he had anything wrong with his brain (as above), but below is the proof —as had been alleged in the tossed lawsuit that he had neurological diseases including CTE. As such this would seem to be a possible trigger date for the statute to start running- and not as the Judge ruled the year 1996. In any event the the claim is not frivolous and by way of example: NFL players who were diagnosed with CTE in the NFL lawsuit that sustained accumulated head injuries many years before (decades in some cases) they were diagnosed with CTE were eligible for awards of upto $4,000,000 dollars.

Conclusion: The Court and WWE don’t GET it.

To Protect the Public (not Trees) Kyros Mails Judge’s Ruling to Wrestlers

“Further, in order to protect the public, Attorney Kyros is ordered to send by receipted mail delivery a copy of this ruling to his appearing co-counsel and to each of the Laurinaitis plaintiffs….”

This needs no comment. You can see Court documents here:

The Lawsuit Filed by the Wrestlers is Here.

The Judge’s Ruling is Found Here.

Three other related  Court Documents Can Be seen Here:

A) Response to a Show Cause Order Filed by Mr. Kyros Team On Procedural History (Hint: it points to some issues in Judge’s Ruling on Basic Facts: ie Billy Jack Haynes Filed the First Case.)

B) Wrestlers Legal Team Response to WWE First Sanctions Motion (Addresses things like NFL and Typos)

C) Wrestlers Legal Team Response to WWE Second Sanctions Motion (Interesting the Court did not engage with many (any?) of the arguments advanced by the lawyers for the wrestlers in this motion. My mom told me at a tender age, that there are two sides to the story.

Note: A few people have asked about the inclusion of this post in the WWE’s fee application and some alleged communications with Mr. McDevitt who conjures up some half-baked theory that we tried to deceive him with this post by “backdating” it. The entire attack is nonsense, makes no sense and is meaningless. We are glad the WWE hires lawyers that are focused on resolving important issues such as the precise dates, timestamps and sequence of each post of this important blog, rather than address things like CTE and whatnot.

McDevitt Versus Kyros. Media on WWE Lawsuit: War of Words Belies Tragic Plight of Wrestlers

Here are some of the lowlights:

Dan Haar: Angry judge throws out sweeping WWE concussion lawsuit
Connecticut Post 9/19/2018

“Attorney Kyros has offered the Court no reason to believe that if given a fifth, sixth or seventh chance, he would prosecute this case in a manner consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,” Bryant wrote Monday. That’s rare language from a judge and on Tuesday, the vitriol from the two sides didn’t stop.

Kyros, reached in his main office in Hingham, Mass., indicated he’d appeal the “truly tragic ruling” to the 2nd U.S. Circuit, and that Bryant missed a main point of his arguments: CTE cases, because they are developing medical conditions, are not subject to the same time limits for filing. “The decision is wrongly decided on a number of factual and legal grounds. The court simply ignored our (statute of limitations) arguments and paid no attention to the 60 detailed personal appeals in affidavits requested by the judge almost a year ago,”

Kyros said in an email Tuesday. “The comments about me personally are inaccurate, and over the top……

Continue Reading here

BloodSport: Tossed WWE Concussion Suit Becomes Triple Threat Match

The triple threat contestants are a federal district court judge, plaintiffs lawyer Konstantine Kyros and K&L Gates litigation partner Jerry McDevitt, a longtime outside lawyer to the WWE.

In reality, the case is turning into something more like a two-on-one against Kyros, who this week was ordered for at least the second time to pay the WWE’s legal fees by U.S. District Judge Vanessa Bryant of the District of Connecticut. Bryant asked a magistrate judge Wednesday to review K&L Gates’ request of nearly $155,000 in legal fees [it was $176,000+ in Vito LoGrasso/Evan Singleton case plus more to come]  it was awarded for work filing a motion for sanctions.

Continue Reading Article Here >>>

No Justice for Jon Heidenreich? Court Cites his Injuries as “Irrelevant Allegations” In Opinion. Read His Affidavit to The Judge

Heart of a Warrior: Read Jon Heidenreich’s Plea to Judge

On September 29, 2017- almost a year ago the Connecticut Federal Court overseeing the wrestlers claims ordered Mr. Kyros and the lawyers representing the wrestlers to get an affidavit from each, writing:” The Court assumes that Attorney Kyros had a good faith belief that the allegations in the Laurinaitis complaint … were true based on interviews with his clients, in which each revealed information about his or her relationship with WWE. Counsel should therefore have no difficulty producing these affidavits within 35 days.” If we did not produce the affidavits the court would dismiss the claims and award sanctions.

Despite the undertone of derision towards Mr. Kyros, and an almost impossible deadline- try getting 60 affidavits from anyone in 35 days never mind from 60 professional wrestlers! BUT finally a chance to talk directly and explain to the Judge that the allegations were real, made in good faith and very important to understand the factual basis of each of the wrestlers legal claims.

The wrestlers all came through and we were able to get all of the affidavits and file them with the Court by near-impossible to meet 35 day deadline! We worked together round the clock all October to get it done!

But last week the court on September 17, 2018 ruled against the wrestlers anyway with little to no mention of the affidavits other than reciting the order to deliver them and confirming that they were submitted.

On page 36 of last week’s order dismissing the lawsuit the court writes: “In addition to these irrelevant allegations*  are numerous others, including a list of physical injuries that have nothing to do with concussions or head trauma, incurred by several Plaintiffs in the ring. [See SAC Paragraph 37 alleging that “Plaintiff Jon Heidenreich sustained serious shoulder injuries requiring multiple surgeries” and that ; Plaintiff Marty Jannetty sustained a severe broken ankle”]

* The other irrelevant allegations the court lists includes: “WWE is a monopoly that earns $500 million annually” “general observations from… a wrestler who is not a party to this lawsuit” [This is Jessie Ventura, you know the former Governor of Minnesota saying such irrelevancies as “Wrestling operated under some of the most unfair working conditions in the country. I don’t know how they got away with it for so many years”  Can anyone reading imagine how they got away with it?] and “WWE does not provide wrestlers with health insurance” Which the court referred to as a non-exhaustive list.

Below is the actual passage from the wrestlers lawsuit, the court calls “irrelevant allegations” and calls “a list of physical injuries that have nothing to do with concussions or head trauma,” As the astute reader will observe the lawsuit drafters appear to have found some examples to illustrate that the plaintiff wrestlers sustained some rather serious injuries some just possibly related to the head while wrestling.

According to an introductory section summarizing the claims at the beginning of the Wrestlers Lawsuit: “Other plaintiffs have documented serious injuries to their head, back, neck and shoulders from their WWE wrestling careers. These permanent injuries are strongly suggestive of past traumatic head injuries and evidence the WWE’s actual past and ongoing notice and awareness of the risk of long-term neurological issues.

I. Plaintiff Terry Brunk twice broke his neck in an ECW matches, and once broke his jaw;

II. Plaintiff Bryan Emmett Clark has had neck and back disc replacements and repair surgeries from injuries sustained in WWE matches;

III. Plaintiff Mark Canterbury sustained fractured C-7 vertebrae in a WWE match;

IV. Plaintiff Salvador Guerrero IV sustained a Subarachnoid hemorrhage in a WWE match. He also sustained an orbital bone fracture to his skull in a WWE match;

V. Plaintiff Barry Darsow sustained cracked vertebrae in a WWE match;

VI. Plaintiff Earl Hebner experienced brain bleeding shortly after being struck in the head with a metal suitcase refereeing a WWE match;

VII. Plaintiff Michael Halac sustained injuries to his cervical spine resulting in neck fusion surgery in a WWE match;

VIII. Plaintiff Jon Heidenreich sustained serious shoulder injuries requiring multiple surgeries from a WWE in-ring injury;

IX. Plaintiff Joe Laurinaitis sustained herniated two discs in his neck in a WWE match;

X. Plaintiff Shane Douglas sustained a fracture in his spine in a WWE event;

XI.  Plaintiff Vickie Otis sustained two cracked vertebrae in a WWE match;

XII. Plaintiff Sylvain Grenier sustained broken vertebrae in a WWE match;

XIII. Plaintiff Terry Szopinksi herniated two discs during his tenure at WWE;

XIV. Plaintiff Marty Jannetty sustained a severe broken ankle in a WWE match;

XV. Plaintiff Ashley Massaro herniated discs in C4 and C5 vertebrae in a WWE event.

These look like irrelevant allegations? “that have nothing to do with concussions or head trauma”!? As the Plaintiffs state these allegations are not irrelevant but go to the heart of the factual dispute in the case- namely what knowledge did WWE have about the long term health risks the plaintiffs would face as well as the more obvious fact that they ran an unsafe, unregulated workplace with no OSHA oversight in violation of labor laws by not providing workers compensation and so forth. Keep walking nothing to see here…

Btw we will have More on the inclusion of Marty’s ankle in another post.